The California Catholic Daily recently had an article critical of teaching meditation in public schools (“Not the business of schools to lead kids to inner peace”.
The piece smacks of sour grapes — we’re not allowed to have kids praying but “they” are allowed to teach them meditation. It’s also marred by a misunderstanding, which is the conflation of mindfulness meditation with Transcendental Meditation. Here’s the slick join:
“Emerson Elementary, however, has but one of many such mindfulness programs, the number of which have grown nationwide to more than 100. One organization that is encouraging schools to adopt meditation practices for students is the Hollywood-based David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness-Based Education and World Peace. The Lynch Foundation promotes Transcendental Meditation…”
There you go. Quicker than a pedophile priest being transferred to a new parish, the CCD lumps two completely different traditions together.
Now Transcendental Meditation involves reciting mantras, which are essentially the names of Hindu deities. It’s already been found to be a form of religious practice, and therefore not permissible in public schools. In 1977, Transcendental Meditation was ruled a religion by the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, in the case of Malnak v. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. Last year David Lynch’s foundation withdrew a grant to Terra Linda High School after an outcry about establishing a Transcendental Meditation club there.
Mindfulness meditation, on the other hand, involves cultivating an attitude of attentiveness through focusing on the breath, and by doing so becoming more aware of thoughts and emotions that arise. Instead of getting caught up in those thoughts and feelings the practitioner stands back from them and simply observes them. Thus, thoughts that would cause anxiety, for example, are allowed simply to pass by, without being obsessed upon and without leading to the intensification of worry and fear. This doesn’t involve religious belief of any kind, nor the statement of religious belief (as Christian prayer tends to do), nor the use of the names of deities. Rather it’s a kind of exercise, not unlike mental aerobics.
Mindfulness exercises do come from the Buddhist tradition of course, and Buddhism is arguably a religion. However they can, as I’ve said, be taught simply as mental exercises. It’s worth noting that trigonometry and geometry evolved as part of Ancient Greek religious practice — Pythagoras was a religious teacher and the exploration of geometry was the search for divine truth — and yet we have no problem extracting trigonometry from its religious context and understanding it as a purely mathematical discipline.
So mindfulness meditation and TM are completely different, although you wouldn’t know that from reading the article, although it does give the last word to a Catholic proponent of mindfulness meditation, who observes: “What’s religious about learning to follow your breath?”
The answer or course, is “nothing.”
But we won’t have heard the last of this. The article indicates that secular humanists are upset by the teaching of meditation in school, although it’s not clear whether the commentator from Americans United for the Separation of Church and State was talking about mindfulness meditation or TM (or both) when he says “It’s not the business of schools to lead kids to inner peace through a spiritual process.” I think we can expect a fair amount of resistance to build as mindfulness meditation — having already being widely shown in scientific trials to have psychological and physical health benefits — continues to grow in schools.
Such resistance is, I believe, healthy. I think it’s vital that we do stop US schools from promoting specific religions, and a watchful eye should be kept on anyone who wishes to promote spiritual practice there. I’d even welcome a court case because I’m convinced that any reasonable judge would confirm that mindfulness meditation is not in fact a religious practice. In short, “bring it on!”