Comments on: Are we doomed? (Part 2) http://www.bodhipaksa.com/archives/are-we-doomed-part-2 random thoughts of a western buddhist Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:38:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Rob http://www.bodhipaksa.com/archives/are-we-doomed-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-46106 Rob Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:23:05 +0000 http://www.bodhipaksa.com/?p=430#comment-46106 I suspect that generally, your most reliable articles on wikipedia are the obscure ones or the ones of primarily acedemic interest where mostly proffesors are the ones who would have much of anything to say at all. That's probably why the physics articles in the wikipedia article were of higher quality. Of course, I have involved myself with an article on a reletively obscure theological position called "Open Theism" which thanks to a couple of popularizers is constantly has a flux in terms of quality. The emphasis of the article is off every now and then has amateur musings and some ideas are left dangling without full explanation. I suspect that generally, your most reliable articles on wikipedia are the obscure ones or the ones of primarily acedemic interest where mostly proffesors are the ones who would have much of anything to say at all. That’s probably why the physics articles in the wikipedia article were of higher quality.

Of course, I have involved myself with an article on a reletively obscure theological position called “Open Theism” which thanks to a couple of popularizers is constantly has a flux in terms of quality. The emphasis of the article is off every now and then has amateur musings and some ideas are left dangling without full explanation.

]]>