In journalism — and I’m talking about the better kind of journalism (here’s the NYT policy, for example) — it’s considered acceptable to use anonymous sources under certain circumstances. Often it’s the only possible option, since government officials as a matter of policy will often only talk candidly as long as the comments are not published under their name.

If Schecter did make up this comment and the bit about McCain’s aides and three journalists being present is a lie, then he’s taking a great risk of being sued for libel, since he’d have to produce those witnesses in court. I guess we’ll find out the truth eventually, possibly after McCain has passed away.

It is exactly like me saying:

An anonymous source the other day told me that he witnessed Obama putting a kitten in a microwave and turn it on full until that cat exploded. Then he grabbed his daughter by the hair and forced her face to his crotch.

It is true – 8 anonymous people that were there told me so !
Must be fact !!!

I guess that’s the difference between those of us who can control ourselves and those of us who can’t. I respect Mr. McCain’s service to his country and the sacrifices he made after being captured. But I’ve got serious reservations about electing someone who consistently can’t keep himself in check. You don’t get do-overs when you’re negotiating with other nations, after all.

“Oops, sorry, Iran. Didn’t mean to call all your women *&^%$#!s”

Well said! Thanks for sharing this.

Wanted to also let you know I’ve posted this week’s Thematic Photographic theme. We’re doing animals this time out, and I promise you it’s happier and less stressful than fretting over Johnny boy I hope you’ll pop in and share a link or two.

All the best!

1. unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one’s direct knowledge: I pay no attention to hearsay.
2. an item of idle or unverified information or gossip; rumor: a malicious hearsay.

According to that definition this isn’t hearsay because three reporters who were present have verified the account. The fact that those people want to remain anonymous shouldn’t affect the newsworthiness of the story — it’s common for stories to be based around anonymous sources.

But yes, that’s a reprehensible way to act.